Labor’s green industry plan may prove a winner – when we know what it is – but the opposition leader got an inflammatory message across with little room for confusionOne speech leaned on blistering rhetoric. The other signalled a major policy shift. In the first there was no policy, but no missing the message. The second contained a substantive change, but it was so wrapped in protective coating that it almost wasn’t there.
In both versions of his speech, the opposition leader referred to tolerance, importing homeland hatreds, social cohesion, antisemitism and the Opera House protest. In that, he said, Australians could not recognise themselves or their country. It was a speech designed to engage a range of specific cohorts and send a bigger message about himself.
Filled with high-octane language , the speech used the Gaza conflict to frame a values-and-identity pitch that focused on family, duty, country, law, liberty and freedom., who provides Dutton with security briefings when required, that especially in relation to the Middle East conflict “words matter”, and Asio “has seen direct connections between inflamed language and inflamed community tensions”. The warning remains current.On Thursday came a very different speech.
Its centrepiece was the creation of a Future Made in Australia Act to coordinate the measures he was hinting at. He could not say precisely what function the act would perform. Details to come in the budget.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
ソース: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 続きを読む »
ソース: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 続きを読む »