Sat, Aug 10, 2019 - 5:50 AM
Tech executives generally don't want the burden of setting boundaries for internet discourse. It's a thankless job on par with being a soccer referee or a schoolmarm. Once such software is created, it's difficult to set rules about how it can be used. Mastodon was founded to enable active moderation beyond what Twitter could provide, by empowering those communities to police themselves; its founders were dismayed to see their software appropriated by the hands-off social network Gab.That's how 8chan found its way back online without Cloudflare, using an application called ZeroNet.
Similarly, 8chan gained traction as a haven for those who had been censored on 4chan, which had previously served as a refuge for those who had been banned by SomethingAwful, a rather dark site to begin with. Banning extremists from social media platforms can prevent their ideas from poisoning the public well; however, the containment strategy can render it impossible for extremists to be"renormalised" by polite society. They'll find a place to exist no matter what, so heavy-handed moderation may end up doing more harm than good.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
ソース: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 続きを読む »