SEC proposes rule mandating companies tally greenhouse emissions, disclose climate change risk

  • 📰 MarketWatch
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 53 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 97%

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

Public companies would be required to disclose how climate-related risks will impact their businesses, how they plan to identify and manage climate risks and more, according to a new proposed rule.

The Securities and Exchange Commission voted Monday to propose a new rule requiring public companies to report risks related to climate change and their own greenhouse gas emissions, in a move that puts the agency at the center of a debate over whether financial regulators have a role to play in protecting the U.S. economy from the effects of a warming planet.

“Today, investors representing literally tens of trillions of dollars support climate-related disclosures because they recognize that climate risks can pose significant financial risks to companies and investors need reliable information about climate risks to make informed investment decisions,” SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said prior to the vote.

The most controversial aspect of the rule proposal relates to Scope 3 emissions, or greenhouse gases released by a company’s customers in their use of a company’s product and by a company’s suppliers in the process of creating inputs. If the SEC votes to propose the rule, the public will have at least 60 days to submit comments critiquing the proposal. The comment period will end either 60 days from Monday, or 30 days after the proposal is published in the Federal Register, whichever period is longer. The SEC will then amend the rule based on public input and hold a separate vote to put the rule into effect. Depending on a company’s size, the rules could take effect as soon as 2024.

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 3. in KR
 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.

Why doesn't Gensler require companies to disclose the risks of doing business, manufacturing or marketing, in China? Doesn't fit with the administration agenda like climate change, perhaps.

How about we worry about the bullshit corrupt hedge funds that are using synthetics to fuck retail traders.

This will really help get the economy going , or just destroy business's that are barely surviving

Clear water, bright sun, clean air Life is beautiful with these Retoken, 💓

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

SEC asks companies to divulge pollution and climate risksClimate change could be taking a toll on profits already.
출처: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

The SEC wants to know a lot more about what companies are doing about climate changeSEC Commissioners will be meeting Monday to propose rules to enhance disclosures regarding climate-related risks. see my naked photos to bad the don’t want to know how retail is getting screwed over.. oh wait they are in on the scam. y tho
출처: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

SEC climate-change rules could demand that companies account for pollution they don’t directly createThe SEC is poised to set new climate-change disclosure rules Monday, and all eyes are on whether the agency could force companies to regularly report the more complicated Scope 3 emissions that are out of their direct control. VeChain 👍 David Beckham temporarily gave his Instagram with 71.4 million subscribers to Kharkov doctor Irina Kondratova. DavidBeckham instagram 'Environmental Issues and Stock Returns.' Our 2015 report quantifies the impact environmental issues have on company stock prices.
출처: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »