Howard Levitt: How a hot job market is giving companies cover to fire costly older workers

Given that Canada’s jobless rate hit a record low in March and employers are now scrambling to find anyone to fill open positions in virtually all sectors of the economy, one might justifiably think that terminations are no longer a major topic of conversation. Surely, employers are desperately hanging on to their existing employees just to keep warm bodies in seats and their businesses chugging along? Not so, it turns out.

Since the pandemic began, most employers have learned to find ways to save money. In what is doubtless a product of those efforts, we are seeing a rash of terminations of mid- and upper-level employees, despite the apparent shortage of available talent today. From an employer perspective, there is no better time to terminate than when the market is white hot and there are more jobs available than people to fill them.

However, this isn’t the end of the story. In this effort to save costs, we are seeing companies use the current job market by increasingly targeting employees whose salaries are on the higher end of the compensation spectrum for their positions. Often these employees have been with the company for decades, working their way up through the company ranks, with salary increases and promotions over the years, which have effectively priced them out of the market.

Companies increasingly targeting employees for termination whose salaries are on the higher end of the compensation spectrum for their position.In evaluating the rights and entitlements of these employees, we usually start by reviewing their employment agreements. Often these longstanding employees have either no contract at all or a brief letter of engagement which contains none of the detailed, negotiated termination provisions one would expect to see in today’s contracts.

Also, their positions may have changed so significantly during their time with the company that whatever contract does exist is no longer relevant to what they currently do. Even the more robust contracts rarely have termination provisions that survive the recent court decisions which have effectively turned severance entitlements from weeks into months by rendering language which tried to limiting severance amounts to Employment Standards Act minimums invalid.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Howard Levitt: How a hot job market is giving companies cover to fire costly older workersHoward Levitt: We are seeing a rash of terminations of mid\u002D and upper\u002Dlevel employees who are being replaced by younger, less expensive ones.
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Howard Levitt: How a hot job market is giving companies cover to fire costly older workersHoward Levitt: We are seeing a rash of terminations of mid\u002D and upper\u002Dlevel employees who are being replaced by younger, less expensive ones. financialpost Zero surprise here. Pre-pandemic, my husband was the only one left in our large mid-50-year-old-ish cohort of accomplished professionals who hadn't been laid off — almost certainly for reaching a 'too expensive' salary/benefits level. And ultimately was too. INCLUSIVE 🙄
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Howard Levitt: How a hot job market is giving companies cover to fire costly older workersHoward Levitt: We are seeing a rash of terminations of mid\u002D and upper\u002Dlevel employees who are being replaced by younger, less expensive ones.
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Howard Levitt: How a hot job market is giving companies cover to fire costly older workersHoward Levitt: We are seeing a rash of terminations of mid\u002D and upper\u002Dlevel employees who are being replaced by younger, less expensive ones. financialpost Zero surprise here. Pre-pandemic, my husband was the only one left in our large mid-50-year-old-ish cohort of accomplished professionals who hadn't been laid off — almost certainly for reaching a 'too expensive' salary/benefits level. And ultimately was too. INCLUSIVE 🙄
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

How U.S. companies are supporting workers on abortionSome of the nation\u0027s biggest corporations have already committed to helping employees receive abortion services. Find out more here.
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »