There has been a move to standardise sustainable finance and sustainability-aligned frameworks, along with disclosure requirements and taxonomies. Arguably, the use of common terms and language will provide clarity and direction for organisations, investors and banking institutions.
Having said this, national legislation and regulatory factors must be adhered to, and there should be a common set of objectives and shared impact metrics to strive towards that would be relevant in the context of a just transition. Ultimately, financial institutions can play a pivotal role throughout these stages, providing advice, guidance, expertise and finance.
The most apparent common focus area? Given the outcomes and commitments made at COP26, avoiding or reducing CO²emissions is high up on most company agendas. On its own, this factor is remarkably impactful. Several companies are following suit, setting targets in relation to this performance indicator.
This approach also allows organisations to shield themselves from potential inflationary increases in conventional electricity supply, and cost savings can be allocated to other productive uses in the economy, thereby supporting growth objectives. Typically, a banking partner should conduct a materiality-mapping assessment exercise for the respective sector, drilling down to a specific client and its operations. What impact do they have from an environmental, social and governance point of view?
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
출처: SABCNews - 🏆 37. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Pandemic sets SA automotive industry back by yearsThe motor industry wants the sector’s master plan revised after several ‘adverse’ events since 2019 Pandemic and ANC response sets it back years Voetsek it's not the pandemic that set it back. It's GovernmentZA redicolous policy's
출처: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »