So what happens when we compare apples to apples? That’s when we need to hear from the horse’s mouth: namely, surveys of employees themselves, who experienced both in-office work before the pandemic, and hybrid and remote work after the COVID-19 pandemic struck.by Cisco of 28,000 full-time employees around the globe.
, 71 percent of respondents said that compared to in-office work, hybrid work improved work-life balance and 58 percent reported less burnout.published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health of bank employees who worked on the same tasks of advising customers either remotely or in-person. It found that fully remote workers experienced higher meaningfulness, self-actualization, happiness and commitment than in-person workers.
Still, burnout is a real problem for hybrid and remote workers, as it is for in-office workers. Employers need to offer mental health benefits withMoreover, while remote and hybrid work overall are better for well-being, they do have specific disadvantages around work-life separation. To solve this problem, companies need to establish and incentivize clear expectations and boundaries. They need to develop policies and norms around response times for different channels of communication and clarify the work/life boundaries for their employees.
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
출처: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »