Alternergy charts ‘triple play’ investment strategy in RE ventures

  • 📰 manilabulletin
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 81 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 36%
  • Publisher: 51%

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

More than a decade ago, the contours of renewable energy (RE) investments in the Philippines had been framed and are being re-shaped through the years – and the nuances of project developments had always been complicated and tricky.

More than a decade ago, the contours of renewable energy investments in the Philippines had been framed and are being re-shaped through the years – and the nuances of project developments had always been complicated and tricky.

The company’s investment experience had not been easy and seamless – but the bold steps it had taken offers wealthy narrative on how investor-counterparts could navigate the terrain of RE developments in the Philippines – especially to the ‘uninitiated’ and the starting players who can’t lean on the deep-pockets of ultra rich parent-firms.“At Alternergy, in the next five years, we expect to build a total of 1.4 gigawatts of renewable energy.

Wind power development is another flourishing investment sphere for Alternergy; and currently taking off from its drawing boards are its Pililla 2 wind farm project in Rizal province; the 10MW Alabat Island wind farm prospect in Quezon province; and the Calavite offshore wind project in Mindoro, which is being pursued in partnership with a subsidiary of multinational energy giant Royal Dutch Shell – and once advanced into commercial fruition, that will yield capacity generation of about 1,000MW.

Manifestly, what sets Alternergy apart versus peers in the RE sector is that: it develops the projects from concept to reality; while some players often flip projects once they are awarded with service contracts or after getting through the permitting phase; while other companies with conglomerate-backing typically acquire projects just to build up their portfolio.

He added “at the time, there were no banks who were willing to lend on a ‘project finance’ basis – and while some banks were willing to lend, their standard requirement was: give me a corporate guarantee. And we didn’t have that because we don’t have a parent company.”

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 25. in KR
 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인