About time...
While we welcome the announcement and it's an important first step, we don't think it goes far enough. Here's why:
How will they produce steel without coal?
Not soon enough!
So the great Germany is taking 19 years to get rid of coal, which it means that it has 19 years of heavy pollution. Wordless.
Not in a hurry then
Yall at the Economist are NERDS and I love it.
HELP with JUSTICE. See for building border wall.Good start.Some wall better than none.Look at Israel(We fight drugs,Extremists)..&we need more money for CITIZENS&their job&disasters like the fires in CA. The Wall will SAVE us$ & RIGHTS.Any party, Help.
Long live Sun & Wind power. Alternate energy is becoming a way of life, winds blowing free of Smog & Carbon.
This won’t be easy in addition to phasing out German nuclear power by 2022. That’s a lot of large power plants being taken offline in a short period without enough time to build enough replacements.
20 years seems like such a long time, especially considering how great the alt energy techs are lately. I appreciate their promise but it worries me how slow these changes are
Yet they hate nuclear. This is all a virtue signaling sham.
The last Joke of Frau Merkel !
Phasing out coal and nuclear at the same time - what are they going to replace it all with?
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
New Industry Report Exposes British VC Industry As An “Old Boys' Club”Nine months after Forbes revealed details of a cross-industry initiative to collect more data on diversity in venture capital across the U.K., today the first results make for shocking reading. thanks for info forbes
더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »