COVID-origins data from Wuhan market published: what scientists think

  • 📰 Nature
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 68%

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

Chinese researchers have published an eagerly awaited analysis of swabs collected at the wet market in Wuhan that has long been linked to the start of the pandemic — as well as the underlying data.

The latest report lends weight to one of the two competing theories about how the COVID-19 pandemic’s origins. Debate has raged over whether the pandemic had a natural origin, with a virus passing from animals to humans, or arose from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The findings support the natural-origin hypothesis, says a researcher who was not involved in either study and wishes to remain anonymous owing to the controversy surrounding COVID-origins work. The presence of many wild-animal species means that a viral spillover that resulted in the COVID-19 pandemic could have occurred, says the scientist. Some of those species, such as raccoon dogs, have the potential to transmit SARS-CoV-2 infections, the source adds.

The strange results could be from laboratory contamination, or improper processing of the data that failed to weed out spurious species identifications, says Hughes. “We must be exceedingly careful with interpreting or putting too much faith in the paper.”

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 64. in KR
 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.

This covid 19 origin from a fish market.Old meat have any kind of bad effects on humans.Actually this is a old meat origin or spontaneously.Ok.Sneha.A Poast Graduate.from Ekm.

Did everyone already forget how they said it came from a lab that studied bats and covid just a few miles away from said market and how one of the female scientists tried to expose it all but ended up coming up missing before she could get out a china. Like fck wake up people

it will never end the debates once non-science people are involved in the debates.

So …. 🤷‍♂️

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Chinese Company Buys Cerruti 1881 and Kent & CurwenThe Chinese firm said it paid the equivalent of $62.18 million for the global trademark rights of Cerruti 1881, and $41.45 million for the global trademark of Kent & Curwen.
출처: wwd - 🏆 24. / 68 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »