at the time, but Canberra’s halls of power have changed and Treasurer Jim Chalmers has indicated that he is open to Ms Cass-Gottlieb’s plans.But the leading competition lawyers advising companies on these deals suggest that the ACCC is using a few instances of delayed notifications to overhaul an otherwise-functioning system.
Norton Rose Fulbright partner Martyn Taylor said Ms Cass-Gottlieb’s concerns that companies doing deals were taking advantage of the voluntary nature of Australia’s current system “may be overstated”. “While Australia’s system is relatively unique, the process works quickly and efficiently for most mergers and provides greater flexibility in negotiating outcomes. So if it works, why change it?”The ACCC is not just pushing for an EU approach to merger notifications – it also wants changes to laws on when it can block mergers to better reflect Europe, too.
Lift their game perhaps?
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
ACCC claws back power for merger reviewsThe proposals take the flexibility out of the current system to ensure that no deal over a certain threshold (still to be determined, but likely based on revenue) escapes the regulator’s net. Does Tom Richardson speak Chinese around the office? He’s a biased prick
더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »