Crow’s name does not appear in a caption of the case, which concerned a dispute related to a copyrighted architectural drawing, and his office said neither Crow nor his company were involved in the matter or discussed it with Thomas. But the revelation challenges assertions by both men that their relationship was completely separate from Thomas’ role as a Supreme Court justice and is likely to add to scrutiny over his ethical conduct.
“At the time of this case, Trammell Crow Residential operated completely independently of Crow Holdings with a separate management team and its own independent operations,” Crow’s office said in the statement. “Crow Holdings had a minority interest in the parties involved in this case and therefore no control of any of these entities.
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
출처: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »