based on household income for the three big investor-owned utilities to help pay for delivery costs including poles, wires, energy efficiency subsidies and wildfire mitigation, while lowering consumption-based rates.I love my electric car, but after more than three years I’m thinking of trading it in for a fossil-fueled model because even in California it’s not easy being a green motorist.
Earlier this month the utilities, consumer advocates, environmental groups and others each submitted proposals for how the new fixed-charge system should be designed. The utilities want higher fixed charges to cover more of their infrastructure and administrative costs. Southern California Edison’s proposal, for example, has low-income customers paying between $15 and $20 a month on top of their usage.
The investor-owned utilities’ use of fixed charges had been capped out of a well-founded concern that assessing an across-the-board fee would discriminate against low-income customers who use less electricity. Climate change necessitated a move from focusing solely on energy conservation to shifting from fossil fuels to electricity generated from wind, solar and other clean, renewable sources.
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
출처: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: BGR - 🏆 234. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »