Companies Are Taking a Harder Line on Union Organizers, Workers Say

Gemma Wyatt stands outside the Apple Store in the Country Club Plaza shopping mall in Kansas City, Mo., on May 11, 2023.

Apple said it had not disciplined or fired any workers in retaliation for union activity. “We strongly deny these claims and look forward to providing the full set of facts to the NLRB,” a spokesperson said. “You’re espousing these values but saying this other organization claiming the same values” — the union — “isn’t good for your workforce,” said David Pryzbylski, a labor lawyer at Barnes & Thornburg who represents employers. “It puts you in a little bit of corner.”Once the union wins a few elections, however, “you pull out all the stops,” Pryzbylski said.

And in advance of a recent union election at an REI near Cleveland, management sought to exclude certain categories of workers from voting, according to the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. It said the chain, a co-op that sells recreational gear, had made no such challenge in two previous elections, in which workers voted to unionize.

Across the companies, the shift is such that some organizers look back on their union campaigns’ early days with an odd measure of nostalgia. According to workers, the company became more aggressive once union organizers made inroads. Around the time that employees in Oklahoma City filed for a union election in September, managers at the Kansas City store disciplined several who supported unionizing for issues related to tardiness or absences that other workers typically have not been punished for, union backers said.

John Logan, a professor at San Francisco State University who is an expert on anti-union campaigns, said companies often considered the potential dissatisfaction of customers, investors and even white-collar corporate employees when calibrating their response to a union campaign. Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz was quick to push back against such accusations while testifying before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee in March, telling one senator, “I take offense with you categorizing me or Starbucks as a union-buster.”

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Office of Personnel Management employee pleads guilty to giving contracts to husband’s companiesA U.S. Office of Personnel Management employee from D.C. pleaded guilty Friday to a conflict of interest violation that netted her and her husband over $10 million from the federal agency.
출처: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Restoring Democracy in the Digital World: The Case for Decentralized Autonomous Companies | HackerNoonThe current status quo is far from what the pioneers of the internet dreamt of, and it's a perspective that many would likely challenge. - daos dac
출처: hackernoon - 🏆 532. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Beijing bans Chinese companies from using Micron chips in critical infrastructure | EngadgetChina’s cybersecurity regulator has banned Chinese firms from buying chips from US memory manufacturer Micron..
출처: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Federal retirement plan allows investment in sanctioned Chinese companiesA month-long Newsweek investigation finds that federal employees are investing in many Chinese companies sanctioned for threatening US nationalsecurity or profiting from forcedlabor. ✍️ dktatlow & valeriereports. Uygher China 🔗
출처: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »