Bankrupt energy companies can’t abandon old wells, Supreme Court says

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 92%

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

Bankrupt energy companies can’t abandon old wells, Supreme Court says GlobeBusiness

 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.

globebusiness AHHHH HATE TO TELL YOU THIS BUT THEY ALREADY HAVE ABANDONED THEM,LEAVING CANADIAN TAXPAYER'S $$$$ TO CLEAN UP (OR NOT?) THE MESS!!

globebusiness This will no doubt have a very important impact on farm-in deals,as risk flows from the existing License Holder to the Farminee.I have Always believed that the regulator should manage a fund,paid into by operators on a profit-share basis,to fund independant decommissioning.

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 5. in KR

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Bankrupt energy companies can’t abandon old wells, top court rulesSince the case came to court, an estimated 1,800 wells representing more than $100 million in liabilities have been abandoned Ambiguous headline.
출처: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Bankrupt energy companies can't abandon old wells, Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court of Canada says the trustee for a bankrupt Alberta energy company cannot simply walk away from unprofitable wells on agricultural land without having to clean up. Should be a no brainer CTVCalgary This would have been an epic failure to the people of Alberta if it went any other way! Good luck with that ! RE: define bankrupt!
출처: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Supreme Court to rule on whether energy companies can abandon old wellsThe Supreme Court of Canada is set to rule today on whether energy companies can walk away from unprofitable wells on agricultural land without having to clean up behind them. I don't even really know what this is about but if a 'wrong' choice exists, I'm sure the Supreme Court will make it because they're morons. Really, it should be obvious.
출처: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Cannabis edibles seller says he knows who used his company name to distribute pot-laced candiesVancouver police said they continue to investigate after pot-laced candies left on vehicles.
출처: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

B.C. First Nation members say pipeline company removed cultural propertyIn a statement issued Monday, members of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation say the area in question is not included in Coastal GasLink’s plans and the company has not provided copies of any work permit…
출처: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Wet’suwet’en First Nation members say pipeline company removed cultural propertyA member of the Gidimt’en clan within the nation said Coastal GasLink bulldozed three tents constructed with timber and canvas in an area along a logging road not included in the company’s plans Don't they mean stuff that was deliberately put in the way recently? Tents erected a month ago? Haha seriously? Does anyone take this seriously anymore? 🎻
출처: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Wet'suwet'en members say pipeline company removed cultural propertyThe British Columbia government says it will inspect the site of a planned natural gas pipeline southwest of Houston following allegations that the company building the project is violating its permits. Wet'suwet'en people stirring up shit. Are their trappers so out of touch they dont know what a pipeline right of way looks like? The company is not off the right of way that has been surveyed. More bs from the Indians.
출처: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »