“There was over $10 billion planned spending under SSE for 2023/24, and only $6 billion was asked for in the estimates,” Penney said.
“Right there we’re at a disadvantage, especially if we insist on having Canadian-made major equipment — and the government, for obvious reasons, often insists on domestic production,” he said.Giroux said there’s definite value in having a domestic defence production capacity — but warned against policies that make Canada overly reliant on local production when more cost-efficient options exist overseas.
“But then that would be in breach of domestic production capacity policy, and that would leave Canada exposed to foreign suppliers in case of a war outbreak that would require significant ramp-up of production,” he said. “It’s one thing to procure major equipment from abroad, but in the case of war, it doesn’t guarantee us that we’ll be first to be served — we’d probably be at the back of the queue.”
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
Lack of domestic defence industry, bureaucracy hindering Canada's military procurement, says PBOReliance on foreign military equipment and doubling\u002Dup of purchasing authority is hamstringing Canada\u0027s international defence obligations.
더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Lack of domestic defence industry, bureaucracy hindering Canada's military procurement, says PBOReliance on foreign military equipment and doubling\u002Dup of purchasing authority is hamstringing Canada\u0027s international defence obligations.
더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »