Water should be a simple business - why isn't it?

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

Water should be a simple business - why isn't it?
대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

What has gone so badly wrong in the water industry?

  • 📰 BBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 52 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 97%

In commercial terms, water should be a simple business - everyone needs to buy it for survival.

Many other developed nations chose not to privatise water supply. Indeed our near-neighbours Ireland only began charging households for water within the past decade. Thames Water stands out because of the high level of debt at 80% of its value, close to regulatory limits and well above other water companies. It is joint bottom of the standards league tables for leaks, sewage pollution and water treatment.

The previous owners, Australian financiers Macquarie, left the company £10bn in debt having extracted healthy dividends. All of this was perfectly allowed in the system, but were partly a product of that era of ultra-low interest rates.Thames boss Sarah Bentley stepped down last week after just two years in the job

Indeed, water companies excelled at gaming the regulations that existed to extract the most short-term profits. In 2010 the coalition government also commissioned a report that channelled water companies' complaints about Ofwat's regulatory touch being onerous.

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

BBCNews /  🏆 3. in KR
 

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

From privatisation to profits: How providing clean water became a murky businessFrom privatisation to profits: How providing clean water became a murky businessFury over sewage, leaks and supply problems - amid a backdrop of soaring profits and pay packets for firms - have fuelled calls for reform of the water industry.
더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »



Render Time: 2025-01-16 10:22:35