While the pace of climate change is a matter of some debate, most would argue that our path of travel is not.
As investors, our primary job is to predict the future. This means that we are compelled to develop a deeper understanding of the growing body of research that lies at the intersection of company financial information and climate science if we are to paint a robust picture of companies' future risks and opportunities.
For companies with business operations that are highly dependent on water, those taking active steps now to reduce their water dependence will be better positioned than slow-moving peers. Moreover, they will drive demand as customers of businesses that make"green" products and services. More efficient use of water should ultimately lead to lower operating costs, giving them an important competitive edge.
By viewing companies through a climate lens, such as water stress, we can augment our traditional investment view that is anchored on financial statement analysis and factor in the proactive steps that companies are taking to gain a more nuanced assessment of a company's fair value and future earnings potential.
yep we need to know who is going to waste their $$$$ and quit flying and driving and farting and eating meat!!! pls do tell!!!
People for Ethical Woodlands Demand California be fined for its egregious failure to manage its forests. The money wasted on the Climate Change hoax could be used to take them to court.
Sustain_Today
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
출처: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »