on Friday to decide whether a Trump era-ban on bump stocks, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns, violates federal law..
The new case is not about the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms,” but rather whether the Trump administration followed federal law in changing the bump stock regulation. A shooter must maintain constant forward pressure on the weapon with the non-shooting hand and constant pressure on the trigger with the trigger finger, according to court records.
이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
Supreme Court will review ban on rapid-fire bump stocks, used in Las Vegas mass shootingFederal appeals courts have come to different decisions about whether the regulation defining a bump stock as a machine gun comports with federal law.
출처: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court will rule on ban on rapid-fire gun bump stocksThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a ban on gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns violates federal law. The justices said Friday they'll hear arguments next year over a gun bump stocks regulation the Justice Department implemented after the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.
출처: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court agrees to rule on whether AFT can ban rapid-fire 'bump stocks'Supreme Court to hear case on whether the government may ban the sale or use of 'bump stocks' that can transform a semiautomatic rifle into one that shoots hundreds of bullets per minute with a single pull of the trigger.
출처: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court to rule on ban of rapid-fire gun bump stocksA regulation on the gun attachments was put in place by the Justice Department after the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas that killed 60 people and injured hundreds more.
출처: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »