held not only that content was king but that content was everything. Pour money into original series, churn out as many high-quality titles as possible, and subscribers would surely follow.in defeat for all but Netflix. But new insight into viewership data from the year of TV’s highest peak is a staggering illustration of just how poorly theseof nearly 1,000 original series — the overwhelming majority of viewing time was claimed by just a handful of those series. Indeed, on all of the major U.S.
With fewer new series now flowing to screens in the post-peak TV era, it will be interesting to see whether viewers divide their time more evenly between titles, which would give streamers more value for their dollar on original content. Indeed, shifting patterns in 2023 — when SVOD original series output dropped for the first time in a decade — indicates this may well be the case.
이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
SCOTUS to decide case on how the government talks to social media companiesMurthy v. Missouri could change how platforms deal with covid misinformation, election disinformation, and public emergencies.
출처: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court wary of limiting White House contact with social media companiesThis is additional taxonomy that helps us with analytics
출처: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court Wary of Limiting Federal Contact With Social Media CompaniesSee multiple perspectives from Reuters, Washington Examiner, and New York Times (News) at AllSides.com.
출처: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
Supreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companiesDuring oral arguments on Monday, both liberal and conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared wary of imposing broad limits on how the government can communicate with social media companies about problematic content it thinks should be removed. The case at issue is called Murthy v. Missouri, and it asks the court to determine whether the Biden administration’s communications with platforms coerced the companies to take down content, like misinformation about covid vaccines, thereby violating the First Amendment.
출처: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »