Meta vs the FTC: Meta claims WhatsApp and Insta acquisition wasn't monopolistic

  • 📰 PhoneArena
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 29 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 59%

Apps 뉴스

Vs

Izzy, a tech enthusiast and a key part of the PhoneArena team, specializes in delivering the latest mobile tech news and finding the best tech deals. Her interests extend to cybersecurity, phone design innovations, and camera capabilities.

Meta and the FTC are currently in a legal fight over whether or not Meta acquiring WhatsApp and Instagram was a monopolistic move. The FTC claims that the practice was indeed monopolistic, but Meta is trying to dismiss this claim,In the ongoing legal battle, Meta claims that Instagram and WhatsApp's acquisition was to the benefit of consumers. The company has now filed a motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit against the US FTC.

The second point Meta makes is that its acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram has benefited consumers. As the company claims, it has spent"billions of dollars" and invested"millions of hours" to make both these apps better, more reliable, and more secure. Meta claims that in the FTC complaint, the market definitions are"unreasonably narrow". It seems like the FTC has excluded platforms like TikTok and YouTube from the market it is focusing on. The market instead only includes Facebook, Insta, Snapchat, and MeWe, claims Meta.

이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 322. in KR
 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인