The Supreme Court upholds a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business interests

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business and anti-regulatory interests, declining their invitation to weigh in on a broader, never-enacted tax on wealth.

But the larger significance of the ruling is what it didn't do. The case attracted outsize attention because some groups allied with the Washington couple who brought the case argued that the challenged provision is similar to a wealth tax, which would apply not to the incomes of the very richest Americans but to their assets, like stock holdings. Such assets now get taxed only when they are sold.

The court ruled in the case of Charles and Kathleen Moore, of Redmond, Washington. They challenged a $15,000 tax bill based on Charles Moore’s investment in an Indian company, arguing that the tax violates the 16th Amendment. Ratified in 1913, the amendment allows the federal government to impose an income tax on Americans. Moore said in a sworn statement that he never received any money from the company, KisanKraft Machine Tools Private Ltd.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Supreme Court upholds a tax on foreign income over a business-backed challengeWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business and anti-regulatory interests, declining...
출처: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

US Supreme Court won't upend tax on Americans' foreign earningsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a challenge to a tax on Americans who have invested in certain foreign corporations, issuing the decision at...
출처: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »