PRSA funding changes incentivised company owners/directors to fund their pensions when funds allowed, but it did lead to some 'aggressive tax planning'. Photograph: iStock
With employees still bound by the upper earnings limit for tax relief – €115,000 a year – the big benefit was for business owners, who were able to use the change to substantially boost their pension funding, gaining tax relief in the process. One example cited was a director of a company, who employed one of his children on the minimum wage, and then created a PRSA and funded it with €1 million. Or a wife could be hired on a salary of €5,000 and her pension bumped up.
It is undoubtedly a sharp reduction on the benefit that was previously in place but, as Delaney notes, it is still “very attractive” compared with what an employee is entitled to.
대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인
Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.
출처: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »
출처: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »