Why did OnlyFans ban sexually explicit content? It says it's the credit card companies

  • 📰 CNN
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 95%

Malaysia News News

Malaysia Malaysia Latest News,Malaysia Malaysia Headlines

'Payment processors have considerable power over sites like OnlyFans and Pornhub,' one law professor says. 'They're private companies. But should we be worried about the kind of power they have?'

Thursday's decision by the creator platform OnlyFans to soon stop hosting a wide swath of sexually explicit content is sending shockwaves through the internet.

OnlyFans, a website with 130 million users and more than 2 million content creators, has become synonymous with pornography. For many, performing on the app is a lifeline: Some who lost their jobs during the pandemic turned to sharing explicit videos of themselves on OnlyFans to help pay the bills. Many of these sex workers are now expressing outrage at what they view as OnlyFans's betrayal of a community that enabled the platform's massive success.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in MY
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Get the story right.

Malaysia Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Malaysia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Real Reasons Why Companies Don’t Want You To Work RemotelyGiven the nearly universal acceptance of remote work, there has to be some underlying reasons why some companies are pushing back against it. Here are some of the reasons why middle management and executives are afraid of this trend continuing. wow This gets so wrongly generalized. In reality this differs from person to person, company culture to company culture, role to role, situation to situation, etc, etc.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »