Oracle Argues District Court Misapplied Merger Doctrine

Oracle vs. Google Court Filing, retrieved on May 9, 2014, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 8 of 16. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here a. Merger The merger doctrine functions as an exception to the idea/expression dichotomy. It provides that, when there are a limited number of ways to express an idea, the idea is said to “merge” with its expression, and the expression becomes unprotected. Altai, 982 F.2d at 707-08.

Math.max” example, Oracle explains that the developers could have called it any number of things, including “Math.maximum” or “Arith.larger.” This was not a situation where Oracle was selecting among preordained names and phrases to create its packages. As the district court recognized, moreover, “the Android method and class names could have been different from the names of their counterparts in Java and still have worked.” Copyrightability Decision, 872 F. Supp. 2d at 976.

Nederland Laatste Nieuws, Nederland Headlines

Similar News:Je kunt ook nieuwsberichten lezen die vergelijkbaar zijn met deze die we uit andere nieuwsbronnen hebben verzameld.

Google Argues That the Merger Doctrine Bars Copyright Protection of Oracle's Source CodeGoogle argues that, because there is only one way to write the names and declarations, the merger doctrine bars copyright protection.
Bron: hackernoon - 🏆 532. / 51 Lees verder »