Supreme Court justices appeared wary of limiting the government’s ability to communicate with social media platforms in a major online speech case on Monday. In July 2023, a federal judge ruled that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by “coercing” or “significantly encouraging” certain content moderation decisions by social media companies, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most of the justices appeared convinced that government officials should be able to try to persuade private companies, whether news organizations or tech platforms, not to publish information so long as the requests are not backed by coercive threats.
Oral arguments before the high court on Monday centered on a high-profile lawsuit filed by Louisiana, Missouri, and other parties accusing officials in the Biden administration of relying on social media platforms to censor online viewpoints unconstitutionally, including conservative ideas. Justices appeared to be divided among a variety of ways to handle the final decision in the...U.S.
The justices heard oral arguments in the administration's appeal of a lower court's preliminary injunction constraining how White House and certain other federal officials communicate with social media platforms.The Republican-led states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with five individual social media users, sued the administration. They argued that the...
Nederland Laatste Nieuws, Nederland Headlines
Similar News:Je kunt ook nieuwsberichten lezen die vergelijkbaar zijn met deze die we uit andere nieuwsbronnen hebben verzameld.
Bron: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Lees verder »