On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Murthy v. Missouri, a case spurred by conservative state attorneys general about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to remove speech it didn’t like. In a 6-3 decision, the court reversed the decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found unconstitutional coercion in the government’s conduct.
” On top of that, the timing of platforms’ content moderation decisions that were in question cast doubts on the causal relationship between government pressure and the platforms’ choices, according to the court.
Wij hebben dit nieuws samengevat zodat u het snel kunt lezen. Bent u geïnteresseerd in het nieuws, dan kunt u hier de volledige tekst lezen. Lees verder:
Nederland Laatste Nieuws, Nederland Headlines
Similar News:Je kunt ook nieuwsberichten lezen die vergelijkbaar zijn met deze die we uit andere nieuwsbronnen hebben verzameld.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Biden administration's contacts with social media companiesThe court determined that the users and two states, Louisiana and Missouri, did not have the legal right to seek an injunction against the Biden administration in federal court.
Bron: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Lees verder »
Supreme Court Won’t Stop Biden Administration From Working With Social Media CompaniesAlison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.
Bron: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Lees verder »
Supreme Court tosses out claim Biden administration coerced social media companies to remove contentLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Bron: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Lees verder »