The End of the Chevron Doctrine Is Bad for Business

  • 📰 HarvardBiz
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 63%

Nederland Nieuws Nieuws

Nederland Laatste Nieuws,Nederland Headlines

Two recent Supreme Court decisions produced sweeping changes to how regulation works in the United States, shifting power from agencies to the courts.

Investment will now take place against the backdrop of the “judicial veto,” where a wide range of potential litigants and sympathetic judges will decide which regulations actually go into effect, and when. According to conventional wisdom, scaling back the regulatory state will help businesses. However, the court’s rulings will suppress business investment in three unintended ways.

The overall effect of this will be less innovation and reduced competitive advantage for U.S. businesses., shifting power to the courts. This change will limit — or at least slow — the enforcement of new rules across industries. Many in the business world havethe decisions, which U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne P. Clark said “will help create a more predictable and stable regulatory environment,” with less regulation generating more investment.

Wij hebben dit nieuws samengevat zodat u het snel kunt lezen. Bent u geïnteresseerd in het nieuws, dan kunt u hier de volledige tekst lezen. Lees verder:

 /  🏆 310. in NL
 

Bedankt voor uw reactie. Uw reactie wordt na beoordeling gepubliceerd.

Nederland Laatste Nieuws, Nederland Headlines

Similar News:Je kunt ook nieuwsberichten lezen die vergelijkbaar zijn met deze die we uit andere nieuwsbronnen hebben verzameld.

The End of the Chevron Doctrine Is Bad for BusinessTwo recent Supreme Court decisions produced sweeping changes to how regulation works in the United States, shifting power from agencies to the courts.
Bron: HarvardBiz - 🏆 310. / 63 Lees verder »