Three ways to finance the Covid-19 policy response - The Mail & Guardian

  • 📰 mailandguardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 92%

Россия Новости Новости

Россия Последние новости,Россия Последние новости

The government will have to consider the pros and cons of direct taxation, de facto taxation and debt as it negotiates the coronavirus economic crisis.

Notes: Authors’ calculations. Tax data from Sars Tax Statistics . Consumption estimates from IES , where level one includes expenditure on alcohol, restaurants and vacations, as well as 10% of transport; and level five additionally includes expenditure on durables and all transport.

Usually one might be apprehensive about raising taxes during a downturn for fears of stifling aggregate demand. These fears may not apply in full to well-targeted taxation during the Covid-19 lockdown: the lockdown itself imposes the restrictions on non-essential consumption, meaning increased taxation on top-income earners might not generate harmful economic effects on the economy through depressed aggregate consumption.

In short, savings during the lockdown are surely increasing for a subset of the population and it is unclear that we should treat these accumulated savings as pent-up demand waiting to explode the moment lockdown ends. In that light, a just use of these accumulated savings can be to redistribute it to those who need and will use it.

 

Спасибо за ваш комментарий. Ваш комментарий будет опубликован после проверки
Мы обобщили эту новость, чтобы вы могли ее быстро прочитать.Если новость вам интересна, вы можете прочитать полный текст здесь Прочитайте больше:

 /  🏆 2. in RU

Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости