Liberals leaving nuclear's future 'to the market' while other countries bet big

  • 📰 nationalpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 67 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 80%

Россия Новости Новости

Россия Последние новости,Россия Последние новости

\u0027We have very ambitious targets and goals from a greenhouse gas perspective, but no concrete plans, in terms of how we\u0027re going to use clean electricity to…

The Liberals have helped fund some companies pursuing small modular reactors or SMRs, an industry term for reactors that generate smaller, though still considerable amounts of power.Article content

Conservative MP Dan Albas said the Liberals are missing an opportunity to take a bolder stance and Guilbeault should be a much more ardent backer of the technology.Article content Gorman says solar, wind are great technologies, improving all the time, but nuclear has to be part of the equation to meet the coming increased demands for electricity.Article content

Ken Darlington, a vice-president with USNC, said their reactor is a test of the technology, but it’s smaller scale, something that could be used in remote communities or in mines.Article content “There has been financial support to nuclear projects in Canada over the last couple of years. But do they need to step up? I would say yes.”

It and the province’s other large nuclear stations Pickering and Darlington account for the majority of Ontario’s power and have allowed the province to phase out coal generation, the biggest carbon reduction achieved anywhere in North America so far.Article content The CANDU reactor that powers Pickering and Darlington has been exported to countries all over the world and Keefer said it is a tremendous economic opportunity for the country as well.

“They need to include nuclear and be proud of nuclear as a green technology, which will encourage investors to do that and de-risk capital.”

 

Спасибо за ваш комментарий. Ваш комментарий будет опубликован после проверки

If the Liberals were serious about climate change and not in the pockets of solar and wind companies, than they’d clearly support nuclear.

It was a stupid, obviously-false answer as an attempt to avoid answering a question. Leaving power gen to the market means gas and coal.

More and more, the Liberal 'plan' seems to be brownouts and blackouts while we wait for the wind to blow and the sun to shine.

Either there is a climate emergency or there isn't. To the extent we opt for improvement, why not go for an energy source that is (1) clean, (2) reliable and (3) safe? Answer: that would be nuclear. If you want markets to dictate the form, stop all subsidies to solar and wind

The Liberal Government is disarming the Canadian people from all reason and accountability skills

nuclear... stupid beyond belief

The sold it off to SNC Lacalin to help their buddies.

As a Conservative I am appalled that they would leave this to the market! We should have more government intervention instead

Translation: TeamClownCar🧦🧦🤡🤡🍌🍌🎈🎈

Мы обобщили эту новость, чтобы вы могли ее быстро прочитать.Если новость вам интересна, вы можете прочитать полный текст здесь Прочитайте больше:

 /  🏆 10. in RU

Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости

Similar News:Вы также можете прочитать подобные новости, которые мы собрали из других источников новостей

Two bids for house close to Toronto’s Cricket Club gets it off the market after 10 daysBedford Park home last 10 days on the market after netting two offers
Источник: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Прочитайте больше »