SAFs are chemically indistinguishable from standard airline fuel – but their production process is significantly different than traditional fuels — though unlike EVs in the auto sector, there is much debate about which SAF approaches will be the ultimate winners, and what tradeoffs need to be made today to support current technologies in development.
Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury conveyed the matter at a panel at Britain's Farnborough International Airshow – a five-day exhibition where executives and key figures gather to discuss the future of air travel: "Probably in the long run — in many decades — we will find a very optimized way of sustainable energy but in the transition, the fast way is to use the SAF, and they are available now," he said.
"We recognize that climate change is urgent and imminent" said Jill Blickstein, vice president of sustainability at American Airlines. "As the world's largest airline, American is committed to developing the tools necessary to decarbonize our operations.", "all aimed at bringing forward the technologies that will help reach our ambitious sustainability goals," Blickstein said.
Tossing out numbers like 'purchase 500 million gallons of sustainable airline fuel (SAF) over five years' is only useful if you provide the divisor – how many gallons does American Airlines burn a year? Answer: 4,157 million in 2019. So only 2.5% 'sustainable' fuel. A tiny step!
'cargo, which is not effected by business class.' Big props to Trevor Laurence Jockims for not abusing 'impact,' but typo the verb is 'affected.' E.g. the effects of increased CO2 also affected airline profits.
lmao you going to stap people to birds? Maybe breed gryphons?
So long as the customer isn’t paying any additional I’m all for it
Biofuel + eletrics + pretend there no fckng Esg agenda, and keep it going.
Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости
Similar News:Вы также можете прочитать подобные новости, которые мы собрали из других источников новостей
Источник: newscientist - 🏆 541. / 51 Прочитайте больше »