Every year, tens of thousands of aspiring young moguls enrol at business school for an MBA, hoping to climb the corporate hierarchy. They are following predecessors who now run many leading companies, from Alphabet, Amazon and Apple to Microsoft and Walmart.
We found no evidence that CEOs with such degrees increase sales, productivity, investment or exports relative to the levels the company achieved before. It may even be that, by ignoring broader stakeholders, such managers damage long-term profitability. For example, we found that higher-skilled employees were more likely to leave after the relative wage declines.
The reason for the relative decline in workers’ wages and shareholders’ gain is clear. Companies run by CEOs without a business degree share increases in revenues or profits with their workforce — typically one-fifth of higher value-added. This ceases when a business-educated leader takes over. The wage impact is greater in concentrated industries.
Another factor may be that the majority of business degree students interact closely with each other and often have little contact with blue-collar and clerical workers. As CEOs, they may not see the viewpoint of the rank-and-file or consider workers as stakeholders.So is the current business school system broken? Not necessarily. First, only a small fraction of students become chief executives. Many work in other managerial positions, where their training may have very different implications.
More pertinent....are MBAs good for anything?
Good morning Samsung,thanks everyone.
no
Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости
Similar News:Вы также можете прочитать подобные новости, которые мы собрали из других источников новостей
Источник: pcgamer - 🏆 38. / 67 Прочитайте больше »
Источник: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Прочитайте больше »