Tesla Tanks While Industry Improves In Long-Term Dependability Study

  • 📰 ForbesTech
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 59%

Россия Новости Новости

Россия Последние новости,Россия Последние новости

In its first appearance in the J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study EV brand Tesla was among the worst, while overall industry long-term dependability improved.

place out of 32 brands between Jaguar and Mercedes-Benz . Dead last was Land Rover with 273 PP1002020 Toyota C-HR sports coupe was one of the two highest rated cars in the J.D. Power 2023 VehicleToyota C-HR and Lexus RX were the highest-ranked individual models in the study, each with 111 PP100— both showing improvement in eight of the nine problem categories from a year ago.

Specifically, infotainment systems which led the way with 49.9 PP100 reported by owners. According to the study, six of the top 10 problem areas were infotainment-related, including:Built-in Bluetooth system connectivity Navigation system inaccurate/outdated map Curiously, the study reveals mass market brands actually improved more than pricey premium brand and lot of that has to do with how technology is rolled out. In this year's VDS consumers reported 182 PP100, an improvement of six PP100 over 2022 and 23 PP100 fewer than the 205 reported for premium brands—the widest gap between the two segments since the study was launched 34 years ago, according to J.D. Power.

Мы обобщили эту новость, чтобы вы могли ее быстро прочитать.Если новость вам интересна, вы можете прочитать полный текст здесь Прочитайте больше:

 /  🏆 318. in RU
 

Спасибо за ваш комментарий. Ваш комментарий будет опубликован после проверки

What?

😂😂😂

Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости

Similar News:Вы также можете прочитать подобные новости, которые мы собрали из других источников новостей

Affirm to lay off 19% of staff, stock tanks after earningsAffirm Holdings Inc. shares were plunging 18% in after-hours trading Wednesday after the buy-now-pay-later company fell short with its results and outlook. Thats not bullish? Lol That company was doom since day one. Good thing all the early IPO investors stole all that money.
Источник: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Прочитайте больше »