The pension fund transfer business needs urgent scrutiny

  • 📰 FT
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

Россия Новости Новости

Россия Последние новости,Россия Последние новости

Insurers are receiving a very handsome reward for such a low-risk business

There is a comfortable consensus in the UK pensions business that pension schemes’ funding has recently improved so much that they can safely move towards a so-called endgame. This happens in two ways. One is by transferring risk to an insurer via a buy-in, or bulk annuity purchase, where a pension scheme takes out an insurance policy that pays out all commitments to its members. The other is a buyout, where the scheme transfers all its liabilities to the insurer.

At the same time, a run-on allows pensions to be financed with a healthier risk appetite across a wider range of asset categories than insurers tolerate. That highlights the broader economic consequences of transferring risk to insurers. Graham Pearce and John O’Brien of consultants Mercer point out that the risk transfer transaction process is inefficient and costly.

Мы обобщили эту новость, чтобы вы могли ее быстро прочитать.Если новость вам интересна, вы можете прочитать полный текст здесь Прочитайте больше:

 /  🏆 113. in RU
 

Спасибо за ваш комментарий. Ваш комментарий будет опубликован после проверки

Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости