: A man lost his appeal in the Court of Appeal today to claim RM29,000 in unpaid salary from a cleaning services company owned by a Bangladeshi national.
Delivering the court’s decision, Justice Ahmad Zaidi said there was no merit in Gunasegaran’s appeal. Justice Ahmad Zaidi pointed out the absence of salary slip, contribution to SOCSO and Employees Provident Fund to back Gunasegaran’s claim that he was employed by the company. He said Section 11 of the Contract Act 1950 did not apply in this case and the High Court’s ruling that the letter of appointment was void, was erroneous.
لقد قمنا بتلخيص هذا الخبر حتى تتمكن من قراءته بسرعة. إذا كنت مهتمًا بالأخبار، يمكنك قراءة النص الكامل هنا. اقرأ أكثر: