MultiChoice, SABC break competition merger rules

  • 📰 SowetanLIVE
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

Sverige Nyheter Nyheter

Sverige Senaste nytt,Sverige Rubriker

In a blow to MultiChoice and the SABC, the Competition Commission has ruled that a channel distribution agreement between them, signed in 2013, constitutes a notifiable merger.

Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 13. in SE
 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.

SABCNewsOnline is blessing money and working on a loose by wanting to keep multichoice as a back up to keep them floating , The time and day where leadership will grow some balls to cut multicjoice and starting making their own choice only then they will benefit

I don't understand why SABCNewsOnline is paying Multichoice so much money to keep them on air while you can access channel 404 without subscribing with DSTV on a normal TV using Ariel, when you outside the country you can watch it on youtube or access it via their website

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker

Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.

SABC: New agreement with MultiChoice to benefit both companiesThe five-year agreement is said to be over R500m and will allow MultiChoice the right to broadcast SABC’s 24-hour news channel and entertainment channel, SABC Encore. They found a new way to rip us off Yeeeeeaaaaaaaassssss Both must go.
Källa: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Läs mer »

SABC, Multichoice deal ruled a mergerCompetition Commission finds the 2013 transaction amounted to a merger Weldone That was evident from the onset, Hlaudi made a killing from this deal and must be arrested for selling a State property🙅🙅 MbuyiseniNdlozi 4
Källa: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Läs mer »

SABC, MultiChoice say 2013 distribution agreement not a mergerThis follows a ruling from the Competition Commission that the agreement constitutes a notifiable merger under the Competition Act. It doesn’t matter what these 2 companies say, what matters is what the commission says.we all know that executives coin it in these backyard deals.
Källa: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Läs mer »