The justices, in a 6-3 ruling, found that a $250,000 cap on the amount of money political candidates can be reimbursed after an election for personal loans to their own campaigns ran afoul of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech by unjustifiably burdening political expression.
In a blistering dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan said the court was effectively aiding and abetting corruption in Washington by allowing donors to contribute to a campaign after an election in a way that benefits the candidate personally. "The politician is happy; the donors are happy. The only loser is the public. It inevitably suffers from government corruption," Kagan said.
Trevor Potter, president of Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan group that supports campaign finance laws, expressed disappointment at the ruling. The provision at issue was part of a major campaign finance law that already has been chipped away at by the Supreme Court including in athat allowed unlimited independent spending by corporations and unions during elections as constitutionally protected free speech.
Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:
Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker
Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.
Supreme Court rules for Sen. Cruz in campaign finance caseThe Supreme Court has sided with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas in his challenge to a provision of federal campaign finance law. 🤦♀️ Their system works. Shocker. Hunh. A bought white supremacist majority backs a white supremacist. Who would think? The Supreme Court is absolutely corrupted by dark money. We either take it back and wipe out the donors or we sit back and just watch it happen.
Källa: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Läs mer »
Court rules for Texas Sen. Ted Cruz in campaign finance caseOn May 16 the United States Supreme Court sided with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas in his challenge to a provision of federal campaign finance law. Teddy wants to use Russian money. That's all C'mon Rafael Edward Cruz tedcruz We know who you serve and what your intentions are!
Källa: CBS DFW - 🏆 542. / 51 Läs mer »
Supreme Court sides with Ted Cruz in campaign finance caseThe Supreme Court today sided with Ted Cruz in his challenge to a federal rule that puts a cap on post-election political donations that help campaigns repay personal loans from candidates. Wow... scotus not even hiding their corruption now. They are emboldened and feel untouchable. GOPDomesticTerrorists So Ted Cruz got the bought and paid for segment of SCOTUS to legalize bribery for politicians. What could go wrong? Well when you pack the court with conservatives that happens
Källa: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Läs mer »
Supreme Court sides with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz in federal campaign finance caseThe case may be important for some candidates for federal office who want to make large loans to their campaigns. It involves a section of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
Källa: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Läs mer »