The U.S. is making an effort to end the longest oil spill in history. And this company is fighting against it in court.

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 80 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 72%

Sverige Nyheter Nyheter

Sverige Senaste nytt,Sverige Rubriker

Taylor Energy's downed platform was one of thousands in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana.

Taylor Energy's downed platform was one of thousands in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana. By Darryl Fears Darryl Fears Reporter focusing on the Chesapeake Bay and issues affecting wildlife Email Bio Follow March 2 at 11:00 AM As the longest offshore oil spill in U.S. history creeps toward its 15th year, the federal government is preparing to launch a determined effort to contain the oil and cap the leaking wells.

According to one estimate, up to 700 barrels of oil per day are flowing into the Gulf, rivaling the catastrophic 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon spill. The estimate is based on an analysis by Oscar Garcia-Pineda, a specialist in remote sensing of oil spills, which the government accepted but Taylor Energy disputes.

On Wednesday, during oral arguments for Taylor Energy’s case against Couvillion Group, the private contractor hired by the Coast Guard to contain the spill, U.S. District Judge Ivan Lemelle wanted to know why the company is seeking to block efforts to clean it up. Taylor Energy’s attorney said the company believes the plan won’t work and could make the problem worse.

In the years since the fund was established, Taylor Energy has spent millions of dollars to recover its flattened oil platform and cap nine of 25 wells. For nearly a decade, the company convinced the federal government and its experts that digging into the sediment to cap the remaining buried wells was too risky because it might unleash oil trapped there — arguing that little oil was reaching the surface.

For the current spill, the contractor completed a survey of the canyon site in December and a system it designed to contain oil “is currently in the testing and acceptance phase,” Luttrell said. Garcia-Pineda provided his analysis as an expert witness for the government in a court case that resulted from a 2016 lawsuit filed by Taylor Energy. In that case, the company is seeking to reclaim the hundreds of millions of dollars that remain in the cleanup trust.

 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.

If they can’t extract oil safely and without such extensive & tragic repercussions, those methods should not be allowed. We need to aggressively pursue & implement clean & efficient energy technologies. Earth first. Profiteers last. Let’s go!

Taylor Enegry, who is that, where is the leak and why don't they stop it?

Now I know why Amazon bought the Washington Post...another profit maker. Charging $1.00 to read a news article?

Another way Louisiana is getting screwed but dosen't doesn't know because big money hides it from the public

At least it’s not hurting cows like that crazy GreenNewDeal would, eh GOP? TheResistance MSNBC TheDemocrats AOC

This is why we can’t have nice things, like planets 🌏

👻suit i koymuş cc

shayera local to us. bless their hearts.

Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 95. in SE

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker

Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.

Dozens hospitalized following chemical spill at Alabama water utility companyMore than 3 dozen people hospitalized following chemical spill at water utility company in Alabama. If the chemicals are so harmful, why are they at a water processing plant? Do you want to know why! It’s because we built primitive systems and they need to be upgraded.
Källa: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Läs mer »

Many Company Hacks Go Undisclosed to SEC Despite Regulator EffortsFew companies are telling securities regulators about cyberattacks, a new analysis finds, despite recent efforts to bolster disclosures of such incidents to investors. It's almost like companies aren't honest with their investors, how shocking.
Källa: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Läs mer »