News Formal

Fast-fashion retailers like Zara and H&M have a new threat: the $24 billion used clothes market

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 72%

Sverige Nyheter Nyheter

Sverige Senaste nytt,Sverige Rubriker

By 2028 the used-fashion market is set to skyrocket in value to $64 billion in the U.S., while fast-fashion will only reach $44 billion.

Apparel retailers such as Zara and H&M dominate the world of fast fashion, with Zara owner Inditex making 3.44 billion euros in profit in 2018.

However, by 2028 the used-fashion market is set to skyrocket in value to $64 billion in the U.S., while fast-fashion will only reach $44 billion. "Compared to the overall apparel market, resales growth has been phenomenal," said Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, in the report, which was emailed to CNBC."As the market uniquely meets consumers' preference for variety, value and sustainability, we expect this high growth to continue," he added.

Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 12. in SE
 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.

yes, you are right

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker

Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.

Super fast travel using outer space could be $20 billion market, disrupting airlines, UBS predictsUBS believes there will be very lucrative ramifications from the spaceflight efforts currently led by Virgin Galactic, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Except if you get of course you end up at Neptune. ... and destroying the OZONE Barf-bag market expected to also grow significantly.
Källa: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Läs mer »

Amid skepticism, China fast-tracks foreign investment law to show goodwill to WashingtonNew law seeks to address long-standing complaints about technology theft with the clock ticking on a trade deal. Sure.
Källa: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Läs mer »