Oil and Gas Company Fined for Unpermitted Snow Bridges in British Columbia

  • 📰 BurnabyNOW_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 75 sec. here
  • 8 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 50%
  • Publisher: 77%

Environment Nyheter

ENVIRONMENT,CANADA,OIL

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (CNRL) was penalized $75,000 by the British Columbia Energy Regulator for building unpermitted snow bridges over streams near an oil and gas well.

A major oil and gas company has been penalized $75,000 over an unpermitted road and three snow bridges it built in a rural corner of British Columbia — violations the province's energy regulator described as part of a “troubling” pattern. Ken McLean, a compliance and enforcement officer with the B.C. Energy Regulator (BCER), handed the penalty to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (CNRL) in a decision dated Dec. 9, 2024.

The violations stem from work carried out in the winter of 2021 and 2022, when the Calgary-based company built snow bridges over three streams near an oil and gas well about 110 kilometres northwest of Fort St. John. When inspectors from the energy regulator arrived in the spring of 2022, they found the company had failed to remove the snow crossings — one of which flows into the Cameron River, a waterbody that supports Arctic grayling. By April 2022, officers saw the streams had begun to fill, creating a tunnel in one of the snow bridges. The tunnel, notes the decision, “was preventing fish passage as it was small and filled with debris from the snow fill.” When inspection officers returned in May, the snow fill bridges were still there, and spring meltwater was backing up behind them in violation of provincial regulations. One snow crossing had been partially washed away without any sign the company had tried to remove it. Any oil and gas operator that builds a crossing over a stream, wetland or lake must ensure fish aren’t blocked from moving through the waterbody. If they do, they are liable for up to $500,000 in penalties, according to B.C. environmental regulations. 'Similar pattern of behaviour' McLean found that while there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the snow fill prevented the movement of fish, the company did not have a policy and procedure in place to remove the snow fills, and therefore failed to exercise due diligenc

Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 14. in SE
 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker