If Alan Jones is free to speak, in a free market his sponsors are too | Richard Denniss

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

Singapore News News

Singapore Singapore Latest News,Singapore Singapore Headlines

Pulling ads from the shock jock’s show is mocked as ‘virtue signalling’. But in consumer capitalism it’s known as branding

Are free markets more important than free speech? We aren’t supposed to ask such questions because each of those libertarian goals was supposed to reinforce the other. But they clearly don’t, so it’s time to take a closer look at what “freedom” really means in Australia today.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in SG
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Lovely peach suit

Consumer capitalism IS the problem with Allen Jones, you numpties, it is not some ideologically neutral tool. God help us, harnessing the power of capitalism for social causes delivered us the totally compromised same-sex-marriage campaign which has led to the religious bill.

This essential liberal 'vote with your dollar' argument is totally flawed because it leaves any movement fundamentally unable to draw distinctions and moral principles in its own right. Look at all this mewing and postulating - no wonder 'progressive' libs can't win elections.

Everyone should be free to speak — Tommy Robinson too! freespeech FreeTommyRobinson

I cant imagine anyone but really angry white geriatrics listening to Alan Jones

Singapore Singapore Latest News, Singapore Singapore Headlines