Wuhan market was epicentre of pandemic’s start, studies suggest

  • 📰 Nature
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 53 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 68%

ประเทศไทย ข่าว ข่าว

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด,ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว

Report authors say that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 jumped to people from animals sold at the market on two occasions in late 2019 — but some scientists want more definitive evidence.

, the team zeroed in on the southwestern section of the Huanan market, where live animals were sold as recently as 2019, as being the potential epicentre of the outbreak. The researchers arrived at this conclusion by compiling information on the first known COVID-19 cases in China, as reported by various sources, including the WHO investigation, newspaper articles, and audio and video recordings of doctors and patients in Wuhan.

The authors also examined the locations of the positive samples collected in the market, as reported in the WHO study, and fleshed out information about the potential surroundings of these spots by collecting business registration information, photographs of the market before it closed and scientific reports that have emerged since the WHO’s investigation.

One major finding reported by Andersen and colleagues is the mapping of five positive samples from the market to a single stall that sold live animals, and, more specifically, to a metal cage, to carts used to move animals and to a machine used to remove birds’ feathers.

Taking all of the new data together, and adding a degree of speculation, Andersen suggests that raccoon dogs could have been infected on a farm that then sold the animals at the markets in Wuhan in November or December 2019, and that the virus might have jumped to people handling them or to buyers. On at least two occasions, those infections could have spread from an index case to other people, he says.

เราได้สรุปข่าวนี้มาให้อ่านอย่างรวดเร็ว หากสนใจข่าว สามารถอ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่นี่ อ่านเพิ่มเติม:

 /  🏆 64. in TH
 

ขอบคุณสำหรับความคิดเห็นของคุณ ความคิดเห็นของคุณจะถูกเผยแพร่หลังจากได้รับการตรวจสอบแล้ว

I didn't know a prestigious scientific publishing group would one day suck up to CCP propaganda and shamelessly sell itself to a pittance thrown to them by a reprehensible regime.

‘Garbage In, Garbage Out’, unfortunately MichaelWorobey ‘s paper falls into this GIGO category! Because the inputs (Chinese CDC record of COVID cases) were fabricated by intentionally required the epic-link to market. Read the thread to find why.

Yeah, definitely not the Wuhan institute of virology.

please stop tweeting this. These studies have not been peer reviewed. Also the title it's somewhat misleading. The virus could have leaked from a lab in Wuhan and through infected people found its way to the market where it rapidly spread.

EPICENTRE DISTINTO A CREACIÓN DEL VIRUS POR PARTE DE CHINA.

In the end, it might help humans to understand that dogs are the most loyal and should not be treated as food. Raccoon dogs are my cousins.

Dirty fucking people and country should pay the world

Let’s not eat the unclean

I can't believe how much slack this post is getting! But hey, 2.5 years of careful research is less interesting to me than the opinions of twitter folks, so I'm convinced!

CHINA'TURE. Reputation as the most trusted and authoritative scientific journal has eroded forever.

covid was already circulating since September in Europe, so i can't belive this

This is the third time I've seen you retweet this nonsense. You don't like the replies to your post or what? Read what you published in 2015...

How about Fort Detrick? More information?

Slap in the face🤣:'Liang Wannian, the head of a Chinese government expert panel, said...it was unscientific to conclude that some early cases of people living close to the market was proof that it was the origin of the community transmission.'

I don’t believe that

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด, ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว

Similar News:คุณยังสามารถอ่านข่าวที่คล้ายกันนี้ซึ่งเรารวบรวมจากแหล่งข่าวอื่น ๆ ได้

Wuhan market was epicentre of pandemic’s start, studies suggestReport authors say that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 jumped from animals sold at the market into people twice in late 2019 — but some scientists want more definitive evidence. Hmmmmmm 🤔 Does anyone checked Fort Dekrit? 🧐🧐🧐🤔🤔🤔
แหล่ง: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »

Wuhan market was epicentre of pandemic’s start, studies suggestReport authors say that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 jumped from animals sold at the market into people twice in late 2019 — but some scientists want more definitive evidence. Thanks nature 💰 2 studies to flatten the truth.
แหล่ง: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »

Pair of Studies Say COVID Originated in Wuhan MarketScientists released a pair of extensive studies Saturday that point to a market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. Analyzing data from a variety of sources, they concluded that the coronavirus was very likely present in live mammals sold in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in late 2019 and suggested that the virus twice spilled over into people working or shopping there. They said they found no support for an alternate theory that the coronavirus escaped from a labora There are strong evidences that the first coronavirus was found near the rivers of michigan.... Bogus propaganda It came from a communist Chinese lab
แหล่ง: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »

New Studies Support Wuhan Market as Pandemic’s Origin PointReport authors say that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 jumped from animals sold at the market into people twice in late 2019—but some scientists want more definitive evidence Wasn’t that the plot for Contaigon ? Not surprising at all. Just like Prof Robert Webster warned us it would. Heard him say in 2016 that the next flu pandemic would start in the wet markets of Sth China. That's when I start hoarding coffee.
แหล่ง: sciam - 🏆 300. / 63 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »

New Studies Indicate COVID Pandemic Began in Wuhan MarketBy analyzing data from several sources, scientists concluded that the virus came from animals and spread to humans in late 2019 at the Huanan Seafood Market. They added that no evidence supported a theory that the virus came from a laboratory in Wuhan. If wet market is code for Wuhan Lab… sure LetsFaceItCare I call meadow muffin on you!
แหล่ง: WebMD - 🏆 709. / 51 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »

New studies provide additional evidence that the coronavirus originated in Wuhan marketTwo new studies published Saturday offer more evidence that the coronavirus originated in a seafood market in Wuhan, China in 2019. But GOP said Fauci created it and it would disappear in 2020 after election or wasn’t it a hoax. Trump was Putin’s bitch and we are just starting to clean up his mess. who cares where. it has ruined my life for 2 years. who cares where. it has ruined my life for 2 years.
แหล่ง: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »