and computer programmers — to stop AI developers from profiting off what humans have made.
The artists say they are not inherently opposed to AI, but they don’t want to be exploited by it. They are seeking class-action damages and a court order to stop companies from exploiting artistic works without consent. The teacher, Christoph Schuhmann, said he has no regrets about the nonprofit project, which is not a defendant in the lawsuit and has largely escaped copyright challenges by creating an index of links to publicly accessible images without storing them. But the educator said he understands why artists are concerned.
“There is no arrangement in place,” Brooks said, at which point Hawaii Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono asked Ortiz whether she had ever been compensated by AI makers. “We’re kind of the blue-collar workers within the art world,” Ortiz said in an interview. “We provide visuals for movies or games. We’re the first people to take a stab at, what does a visual look like? And that provides a blueprint for the rest of the production.”
In at least a temporary win for human artists, another federal judge in August upheld a decision by the U.S. Copyright Office to deny someone’s attempt to copyright an AI-generated artwork.
ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด, ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว
Similar News:คุณยังสามารถอ่านข่าวที่คล้ายกันนี้ซึ่งเรารวบรวมจากแหล่งข่าวอื่น ๆ ได้
แหล่ง: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
แหล่ง: KIRO7Seattle - 🏆 271. / 63 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
แหล่ง: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
แหล่ง: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
แหล่ง: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
แหล่ง: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »