Why we don’t trust companies to protect our data privacy in SA

  • 📰 TheCitizen_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 75%

ประเทศไทย ข่าว ข่าว

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด,ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว

A massive data breach in 2017 saw tens of millions of South Africans’ personal information leaked.

has been established with the objective of protecting citizens’ personal data. It is also responsible for monitoring and enforcing organisations’ compliance of the requirements of the Act once it comes into effect.

These issues can be addressed in several ways. Organisations must start complying with the Protection of Personal Information Act. This will bring South Africa in line with more than 120 countries that have already enactedOrganisations can also adopt and adapt guidelines issued by Information Regulators elsewhere in the world and can study best practice from other jurisdictions. It could also help organisations if the Information Regulator in South Africa issued guidelines to implement the Act.

Consumers also weren’t sure what to do if their privacy had been violated. Only 37% felt they knew where they have to submit a complaint in a violation. It has bigger implications, too. If a private or public company is domiciled in South Africa, it must comply with the Protection of Personal Information Act. If it processes the data of citizens in another jurisdiction, like the European Union , it must also comply with the EU’s regulations for the processing of personal information.

 

ขอบคุณสำหรับความคิดเห็นของคุณ ความคิดเห็นของคุณจะถูกเผยแพร่หลังจากได้รับการตรวจสอบแล้ว
เราได้สรุปข่าวนี้มาให้อ่านอย่างรวดเร็ว หากสนใจข่าว สามารถอ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่นี่ อ่านเพิ่มเติม:

 /  🏆 6. in TH

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด, ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว

Similar News:คุณยังสามารถอ่านข่าวที่คล้ายกันนี้ซึ่งเรารวบรวมจากแหล่งข่าวอื่น ๆ ได้

OPINIONISTA: Why company law and the King Codes can’t save corporate SAWhat lies at the heart of the rot in corporate SA may surprise you. Where government gets it right, the private sector and SOEs get it spectacularly wrong. You to recite case law pretty well but one obvious point that is being missed is the respective boards make up and how it came to be. Due to enforced governmental policy via BEE we have a scenario by which certain role players being selected due there political conections. The process is filled with corruption abd unetchical behavior but the company is blind to the process itself. This has a massive ripple effect as these boards are involved in driving the top management structure IE who gets employed etc. King codes etc is nothing more than a guiding principle and a framework and non compliance and there is no real framework of real enforement as the respective boards are made up of people there out of personal interest. With strong moral or business etchics the business culture
แหล่ง: dailymaverick - 🏆 3. / 84 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »