Should Music's Biggest Companies Be Doing More to Help Right Now?

  • 📰 RollingStone
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

United Kingdom News News

United Kingdom United Kingdom Latest News,United Kingdom United Kingdom Headlines

Spotify, Amazon, Warner Music Group, and other major music companies are donating to coronavirus relief — but how do the acts stack up against meaningful measures elsewhere in the industry?

This week, the largest corporations in music — from streaming platforms like Spotify and Tidal to major labels like Warner Music Group and Universal to tech behemoths like Facebook — finally announced corporate initiatives aimed to help support artists and creators in the coming months. Spotify, Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, SiriusXM/Pandora, and others announced a joint donation to the MusiCares

In the same way many critics have pointed out the coronavirus epidemic’s exposure of the structural flaws in America’s for-profit health care system, Erickson sees the crisis as a referendum on a music industry that’s been increasingly consolidated by a select few massive tech corporations in recent years.

Netflix set up a $100 million fund for coronavirus relief for the film industry, Music Business Worldwidereached out to major streaming platforms, the three major labels, radio conglomerates like iHeartMedia, and tech giants like Facebook and Amazon to get a sense of what charitable efforts the corporations were taking to help aid artists.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 483. in UK
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Small companies are the ones doing the most. Large conglomerates, as usual, are doing the least. So disappointing!

Maybe the artists will start charging for their at-home concerts. Or start selling tickets to their tours themselves or sell their own songs that can be imported into your favorite streaming service. Too bad the industry is filled w f:”*ed up people.

George Harrison sang Charukeshi for me, his favorite Indian raga. Twelve years after, I used Charukeshi as the basis for an extended piano composition. Like George, I also formed my own label for more freedom. via YouTube

Yes, since they only pay artist pennies on the dollar. YES, YES, YES,

Yes, but they are too greedy!

Nothing better than telling someone else how to spend their money.

What music companies are more powerful than real estate and medical companies right now? 😐

Like Rolling Stone Magazine?

Not just the companies, and I may be off topic, but celebrities in general can do more. They’re made famous by fans, w/out em they’re nonexistent. So all music, acting, influencing, can give back, and help their fans. Celebrities need to help. JeffreeStar is doing this.

Yes

Shouldn't we all? 🤝

United Kingdom United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom United Kingdom Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

View From China's Live Music Industry: This Too Shall PassAs Europe and the U.S. cope with spiraling numbers of coronavirus cases, Jim Wong has a message from China for his Western counterparts in the live music industry: There’s light at the end of the tunnel EXO PIC EXO 엑소 XIUMIN 시우민 Suho 수호 CHANYEOL 찬열 Chen 첸 DO BAEKHYUN 백현 Kai 카이 Sehun 세훈 Lay 레이 weareoneEXO B_hundred_Hyun layzhang
Source: billboard - 🏆 112. / 63 Read more »