About time...
While we welcome the announcement and it's an important first step, we don't think it goes far enough. Here's why:
How will they produce steel without coal?
Not soon enough!
So the great Germany is taking 19 years to get rid of coal, which it means that it has 19 years of heavy pollution. Wordless.
Not in a hurry then
Yall at the Economist are NERDS and I love it.
HELP with JUSTICE. See for building border wall.Good start.Some wall better than none.Look at Israel(We fight drugs,Extremists)..&we need more money for CITIZENS&their job&disasters like the fires in CA. The Wall will SAVE us$ & RIGHTS.Any party, Help.
Long live Sun & Wind power. Alternate energy is becoming a way of life, winds blowing free of Smog & Carbon.
This won’t be easy in addition to phasing out German nuclear power by 2022. That’s a lot of large power plants being taken offline in a short period without enough time to build enough replacements.
20 years seems like such a long time, especially considering how great the alt energy techs are lately. I appreciate their promise but it worries me how slow these changes are
Yet they hate nuclear. This is all a virtue signaling sham.
The last Joke of Frau Merkel !
Phasing out coal and nuclear at the same time - what are they going to replace it all with?
United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »