Opinion: At mining company Sherritt, any executive pay may be too much

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 92%

United States News News

United States United States Latest News,United States United States Headlines

Sherritt illustrates the problem matching up ‘long-term’ incentive pay for a company’s executives to the truly long-term experience for shareholders

A million bucks here and there, positive feedback from proxy-advisory services, solid shareholder support for the compensation approach in its “say on pay” vote.

However, the shares have fallen more than 97 per cent from their all-time high of $18 in October, 2007, giving it a market capitalization of less than $200-million. That return even includes an amazing 557-per-cent gain from its COVID-19 pandemic lows. To replace options, Sherritt devised a stock program that includes awards tied to how the company performs. The payouts of these performance-share units are based on two things: Sherritt’s stock returns, versus resource-industry peers; and an operational measure that considers cost savings and cash-flow generation. The company looks at results over a three-year period to calculate the final payout. Solid.

Because the plan uses relative shareholder return as a performance factor, and also pays out in shares of common stock, there can be a kind of ratcheting effect when the share price booms. A modest stock grant can explode in value. Other executives who received grants valued between $250,000 and $300,000 in 2020, some of whom also left the company, received payouts in February, 2023, of about $1.1-million.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in US
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines