Gas industry in damage control as landmark study finds LNG 'worse than coal' for the climate

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 115 sec. here
  • 16 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 94%
  • Publisher: 83%

Gas News

LNG,Coal,Worse

For years, the mantra from the industry has been that gas is a bridge between coal and renewable energy. A landmark study has sensationally challenged that idea.

Gas has been widely touted as the world's 'transition fuel' away from coal, but a landmark study casts doubt on the fuel's 'clean' credentials.In January this year, seemingly out of nowhere, US President Joe Biden made a decision that sent shock waves through the trillion-dollar global gas industry.

And at the heart of Professor Howarth's finding was not carbon but, rather, methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas."Even though carbon dioxide emissions are greater from burning coal than from burning natural gas, methane emissions can more than offset this difference," Professor Howarth wrote in the paper.

It was particularly pronounced in the US, where he noted that most of the LNG came from fracking, a process in which huge volumes of water are pumped underground to fracture rock containing the gas.As a result, Professor Howarth estimated as much as five per cent of the gas for an LNG project in the US was lost as leaked methane.

From virtually a standing position in 2016, when Washington overturned a longtime ban on gas exports, the US has risen to become, at various times recently, the world's biggest exporter of the commodity.The rapid ascent had delivered not only America's prestige as a dominant energy exporter, but outsize returns for US gas investors.

Last month, the boss of US energy behemoth Chevron attacked the decision in a broader swipe at the Biden administration's policies. Samantha McCulloch, the head of lobby group Australian Energy Producers, said in the first instance the study "significantly overestimates emissions from US gas production".

While much of America's industry used fracking to extract the gas, Australia's was largely based on conventional drilling techniques on offshore wells. Kevin Morrison from the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis said the industry was flattering itself to think its emissions were as low as it claimed.

Prior to his role with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, Kevin Morrison spent 30 years as a financial journalist. What's more, Mr Martin said some of the assumptions made by Professor Howarth were open to debate, such as his estimate that 2.5 per cent of LNG leaked as methane from the pipes and distribution networks of gas companies.

While methane lost much of its potency when measured over a 100-year time-frame, he said it was 86 times' more potent than carbon over a 20-year horizon — a time when action to reduce global warming would be most pressing.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in US

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Australia's LNG industry faces scrutiny over climate impact claimsA recent US study challenges the assertion that liquefied natural gas (LNG) has significantly lower emissions than coal, raising questions about the environmental claims made by Australia's thriving LNG industry.
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »