Industry warns court reversal to Enbridge's Line 3 could mean trouble for oilfield workers

  • 📰 CTVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 99%

United States News News

United States United States Latest News,United States United States Headlines

The Minnesota Court of Appeals said state regulators must conduct a further review for Enbridge Energy's plan to replace its deteriorating Line 3 crude oil pipeline because the project's environmental impact statement doesn't address the possibility of an oil spill.

Al Beesley, Senior Safety Coordinator, leans on some pipe while waiting for a press conference to start with Alberta Premier Rachel Notley during a tour of Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline replacement project in Hardisty Alta., on Thursday, Aug.10, 2017. ST. PAUL, Minn.

The $2.6 billion replacement pipeline would carry Canadian crude from Alberta oil across northern Minnesota to Enbridge's terminal in Superior, Wisconsin, which lies just south of Lake Superior. The current Line 3, which was built in the 1960s, is increasingly subject to corrosion and cracking, and runs at only about half its original capacity for safety reasons.

The commission earlier this year gave a green light for construction of Line 3, which was separate from its approval of the environmental impact statement. Project opponents and the state Commerce Department are appealing that approval separately, raising different legal issues. Meanwhile, regulators are still considering several permit applications.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in US
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines