Future Fund Invests Over Half a Billion in Weapons Manufacturers and War-Related Companies

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 7 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 83%

POLITICS AND FINANCE News

Future Fund,Weapons Manufacturers,War-Related Companies

The Future Fund, which has been managing investments on behalf of Australians since its inception, now holds over half a billion dollars in shares of weapons manufacturers and war-related companies. This raises ethical and political concerns, especially following a Freedom of Information request.

The Future Fund, with an initial investment of $60.5 billion from the federal government, now holds more than half a billion dollars in shares of weapons manufacturers and war-related companies. Since its inception, the fund has grown to a total of $169.2 billion through investments in global stocks, bonds, property, infrastructure, and financial derivatives.

A Freedom of Information request from Greens senator David Shoebridge revealed that the Future Fund's holdings in 30 'defence companies' (mainly global weapons manufacturers and aerospace companies) totalled $604.5 million as of October 2023. This has led to accusations of politicisation and ethical concerns surrounding the fund's investments

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in US
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Australia's Future Fund Faces Political Backlash Over Investment DecisionsAustralia's Future Fund, a sovereign wealth fund worth $230 billion, is facing criticism from former government officials for investing in companies that Norway's sovereign wealth fund has excluded. The debate highlights the tension between the fund's stated independence and the political implications of its investment choices.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »