The first and leading vote in favour of the panel’s report and for President Cyril Ramaphosa to face a section 89 inquiry, came from ANC MP Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma.Mtimka says, “In South Africa there has been a call in various times when member of Parliament needed to think more about their oath of office than the party line.
Dlamini-Zuma has sought to explain her reasons for voting in favour of the adoption of the report of the Independent Panel of Experts on the Phala Phala matter in the National Assembly.“I did inform the leadership even of how I am going to vote based on that, they know it. So they were not surprised. I am telling you what happened at the meeting I didn’t speak -I was on the list. There were 20-something people who still needed to speak so you can draw your own conclusion.
Let not forget that these voting were not secret . Which leave us with the question. If voting was secret how many could have vote against Ramaphosa
What do they know those ones....
The analyst should make the wise move then
Who are those?
Those analysts are misleading, if the law has been violated, the constitution take precedence over party mandate
The SABC is now known to be wasting money on political analysts by driving a certain factional ideas using our taxes money 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
Hypocrisy at it best..
Just remove them from Cabinet and parliament and leave them with nothing
Bloody analyst.
I'd love to meet this patronising, maggot of a political analyst.